Clashy
eende dam
#LP8YYC8Q
any1s welcome at the dam!! check out our facebook page, "Eende dam Clan"
Wins
4
Ties
--
Losses
34
Win streak
0
Go to Current war
Go to Current CWL
loading clan members...
eende dam
CommandFighting
3
20.4%
24
80.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
ALTEVOST 106
8
29.3%
20
73.2%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Thou Villa
10
45.4%
25
86.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
MCT COC Team
5
20.2%
10
39.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
KRIP-KRIP
7
27.7%
25
89.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
DEVIL DICE™
6
29.3%
29
96%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
بامرام های 101
2
14.7%
14
56.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
RISING STARS
11
46.9%
26
94.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
ARMADOR
12
47.8%
26
87.8%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Night.Wolf
11
50.7%
8
38.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
FREEDOM OF CLAN
15
43.27%
39
90.47%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Мажоры
4
28%
24
94%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Shinobi Society
10
46.5%
24
86.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
AmericanPitbull
19
63.7%
18
73.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Boricua 787
4
23.1%
23
80.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
300 BACK
10
53%
30
100%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Fighter King121
24
80.8%
25
89.5%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Pull Low
9
27.13%
43
97.13%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Manchester COC
22
84.2%
5
27.2%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Indian Revenger
24
84.9%
28
93.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Мусульмани
18
53.4%
35
80.73%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
ملوك الصحراء
19
71.1%
27
94.3%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Organic Armpits
23
83.4%
18
62.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
SeroJA M.k.S.
12
63.9%
28
96%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
اخراجیهای خسته
21
73.7%
29
96.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
الملوك الهلاليه
14
66.9%
21
75.8%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
THE DESTROYER
12
65.1%
30
100%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
битфут
16
66.6%
30
100%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
los titanes♡☆♡
15
62.9%
18
68.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Refrain
2
12.2%
27
89.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Bad Boyz
8
34.4%
28
96%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Lover Fighter
6
34.1%
21
82%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
LAMONGAN KITTY3
10
45.9%
26
90.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
FACIFISTA'S
15
72.5%
30
100%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
bLackpaNthers
14
58.8%
18
72.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
The offspring
13
56%
30
100%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
Mustika C
5
37.1%
29
99.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
eende dam
*SUG@P@*
19
72%
24
88.2%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
9 years ago
Hard Mode?
No