Clashy
Wardogs
#2QQQVVL80
Clan neu aufbau.Wir suchen aktive member mit dem wir neu durchstarten können und erwarten ck cwl aktiv mit dabei zu 😊✌🏼
...
...
...
Wins
14
Ties
--
Losses
25
Win streak
0
Go to Current war
Go to Current CWL
loading clan members...
Wardogs
DHAKA CITY GANG
8
25.8%
23
89.2%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
a year ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
manoto
21
73.7%
27
91.5%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
लिंक रोडचा राजा
11
50.1%
19
69.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
INDO RCES
14
95.6%
7
55.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
tx delta
13
92.8%
13
95.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
KURD OF WAR
24
90.8%
27
94.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
vaiking ha
23
82.2%
27
94.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
los ángeles
5
41.4%
15
100%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
CLAN WAR
29
96.7%
25
85.5%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
Fairy Tail
29
98.2%
9
30%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
KAOS
17
63.1%
20
73.8%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
moon
25
92.9%
29
96.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
Vortex Legion
20
76.4%
16
63.8%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
KAALANS’S ARMY
24
84.8%
24
80%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
پادشای اژدها
20
70.8%
24
84.5%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
DEPREDATORS GT
11
46.3%
27
94.9%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
PIDE Y VETE
16
59.9%
15
58.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
talesh
17
68.4%
24
87.9%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
TBH
2
14.6%
27
94.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
King.wolfs
17
67.6%
25
93.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
labgang
22
78%
12
44.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
pisot
8
47.9%
29
96.9%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
legendary
23
81.9%
24
83.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
العبدان
38
84.2%
40
92.8%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
TF/ The Formule
14
96.2%
2
14.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
project 10,000
10
75.4%
13
89%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
JordT!m
0
0%
9
60%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
dalihana_n1
24
85.6%
23
91.2%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
قطعة ٣ العظمه
12
28.13%
23
59.53%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
PGC APOCALYPSE
19
64.1%
22
83.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
†RIDE OR DIE†
20
75.4%
22
78.9%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
CLAN CAPITAL
16
54.1%
5
21.5%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
afghan tiger
28
95.8%
28
98.3%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
جيفارا كورد
34
62.1%
56
92%
Team size
20 vs 20
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
****امیرعلی****
24
87.4%
6
20%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
$AMOZAKAN$
37
84.4%
13
30.07%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
jeffry dah
14
92.6%
9
72.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
MARSHMELLOW
12
95.2%
10
76.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Wardogs
사랑•Love
5
33.2%
14
98.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
2 years ago
Hard Mode?
No