Clashy
慕兮
#2PYULPYGR
No description set for this clan
...
...
...
Wins
10
Ties
--
Losses
12
Win streak
0
Go to Current war
Go to Current CWL
loading clan members...
慕兮
落叶
3
20%
8
65%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
BadCo.
20
53.53%
42
96.53%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
TN SNKL BOYS
9
31%
21
78.9%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
千古块尘
25
84.9%
18
75.8%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
DEFEAT
13
96.8%
7
55.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
Mud Wheels
8
77.6%
6
50.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
东西南北人
10
76%
10
87.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
mmd-navid
11
83%
4
31.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
เดักส้างโต.ANG
23
39.44%
2
3.52%
Team size
25 vs 25
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
Heisln
16
56.4%
29
98.5%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
zay
30
30.95%
75
68.4%
Team size
40 vs 40
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
ㅏㅏㅏ니애믹 ㅂㅉ살
22
78.5%
21
73.5%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
kings of war
20
66%
30
100%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
SAT NING
11
79.4%
9
78.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
LANE
10
73.2%
13
91.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
أساطير البلد
10
68%
12
80%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
Who is powerful
11
82.2%
6
44.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
李双
11
84.6%
5
43.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
INDIAN BROTHERS
9
68.6%
0
0%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
DAY & DARK
10
79.6%
13
92.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
慕兮
The_CRM
12
88%
13
95.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No