Clashy
اولادالعم
#2PVQPV2QJ
No description set for this clan
...
...
...
Wins
11
Ties
--
Losses
8
Win streak
0
Go to Current war
Go to Current CWL
loading clan members...
اولادالعم
COC BOYES
0
0%
14
45%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
WARRIOR CLAN
22
89.3%
24
83.9%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
nutz nutz
27
92.3%
10
42.9%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
Tabriz
28
95.2%
28
97.9%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
QCPU IExtreme2
25
90.8%
26
90.2%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
los abusamadres
28
95.8%
10
45.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
گرگ ومیش 68
27
95.3%
27
90%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
همه عشقیا
25
92.3%
28
99.2%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
The King's
29
97.6%
19
68%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
Black God
26
90.4%
17
64.3%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
DARK《WOLF》
27
90.3%
1
6.3%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
МАЙКАТА
29
96.7%
26
86.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
الاف ها
19
70%
28
96.3%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
Warhammer
25
90.5%
18
64.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
PLUTO86
26
87.8%
13
49.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
Бандосы
24
78.3%
23
85.3%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
Lost
11
80%
9
80.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
احلى شباب
6
54%
13
92.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
اولادالعم
THUNDER@11
8
66.4%
14
98.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No