Clashy
gang gang foo
#2PRVURVR2
No description set for this clan
...
...
...
Wins
7
Ties
1
Losses
11
Win streak
0
Go to Current war
Go to Current CWL
loading clan members...
gang gang foo
❤قهرمانان کلش❤
0
0%
0
0%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Tie
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
Big dads
3
20%
10
77.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
THE BOYZ
4
33.6%
4
55.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
BLASTERZZZ
1
21.2%
6
48.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
اذلب الخضراء
2
17%
9
60%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
MASIOSARE
6
40%
6
49.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
赵万豪战队
9
68.4%
0
0%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
mabini group
3
34.6%
13
93.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
LUNATICOS locos
6
45.6%
7
56.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
اساطير العرب
15
100%
3
20%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
IdiMeenz
11
74%
12
92.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
Fighters
12
80%
9
67%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
鬼火部落
13
90.8%
4
46.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
pőľ
3
34.2%
9
85%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
allan27
13
91%
1
14%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
العراق
11
86.8%
13
90.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
احلى أصدقاء
3
21%
13
93.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
ابطال بغداد
10
66.4%
7
62%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
gang gang foo
一个人1111
8
69%
0
0%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
4 years ago
Hard Mode?
No