Clashy
Nargles Inc.
#2PCYC00QQ
We ONLY wear cotten blends.
...
Wins
5
Ties
--
Losses
14
Win streak
2
Go to Current war
Go to Current CWL
loading clan members...
Nargles Inc.
BlUegAmMerS
6
48.4%
5
33.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
Doit-je?
6
40%
2
26.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
SAVAGE_BALLER
2
10.6%
5
38.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
نبغى سوراقي
4
50.4%
13
85.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
DARK CLAN
6
58.2%
15
100%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
ATIBAGOS WARIOR
6
40%
15
100%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
vishal ka gand
6
47.2%
10
75.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
the dead
6
50.2%
9
78.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
DFP
7
62.6%
8
65.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
NcBoys:
6
55.4%
0
0%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
Việt Nam COC
2
21.4%
15
100%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
Black Cocs
12
92.8%
0
7.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
Elita King
6
61.6%
11
94%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
YAXSI OGLANLAR
9
68.4%
11
85%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
หัวดอ
11
76.8%
9
70.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
البوارع
12
90%
13
90.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
牧场分部2
5
46.8%
7
51%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
kings clan
5
55.8%
9
65.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
Nargles Inc.
J.M
10
79.8%
11
85.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No