Clashy
星空下的守望
#2P2GP2R0L
QQ群号;834363093,部落密码2019,进部落首先加群,谢谢
...
...
...
Wins
11
Ties
--
Losses
9
Win streak
0
Go to Current war
Go to Current CWL
loading clan members...
星空下的守望
coolys
0
0%
12
88.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
5 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
DENIZOYUNDA YTB
0
0%
12
89.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
ابطال كردستان
1
20.4%
12
94.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
azadî ya kurdan
11
83%
9
69.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
GOODLUCKMYANMAR
7
56.6%
4
32.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
dragon hunter
9
67.6%
4
34.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
پارس
0
0%
13
95.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
梦想
9
17.75%
15
25%
Team size
20 vs 20
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
全都是坑
13
47.3%
13
55.5%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
am to bad
12
86.8%
13
91%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
ATL de Marmille
11
79.4%
3
20%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
iEnVy us
13
90.2%
12
86.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
Haryana K Yaar
13
90%
14
98.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
tote zerstörer
14
94.2%
2
14.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
=ÖLÜMSÜZBEYLER=
13
93.4%
6
44%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
中国联
9
62%
6
40%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
ns boys
11
87.6%
1
12.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
ЧЕМПИОН
12
89%
10
73.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
NikeAir270
8
65.2%
10
77.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
星空下的守望
邵氏带你飞
13
90.4%
12
91.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No