Clashy
KOLYANPUR BOYES
#229Y0RYL2
TROOPS DONET FOR COLIDER😆FUL MASTI CLAN GOOD DONET
Wins
21
Ties
1
Losses
15
Win streak
0
Go to Current war
Go to Current CWL
loading clan members...
KOLYANPUR BOYES
FriEnDs FoReVeR
11
78%
15
100%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
sweet boy
9
74%
10
71.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
Badshot Vhoyz
19
74.4%
19
71.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
一堆儿子娃娃！
20
76.1%
22
78.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
Dark clain
27
96.1%
14
57.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
ورود سوريا ✌
41
96.53%
42
96.2%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
♡☆COMMANDO☆♡
43
95.53%
44
98.13%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
poetra GM
36
84.67%
43
97.6%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Loss
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
☞回忆♬往事☜
41
94.53%
39
92.07%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Win
Ended
6 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
Razor Esports
18
76%
26
87%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
★CLan WArriors★
31
74.07%
26
62.13%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
一瞬间
39
88.33%
38
91%
Team size
15 vs 15
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
The King Of CoC
29
98.7%
14
55.7%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
بلوچستان وطنم
29
98.1%
29
99.3%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
ตานุFC
26
93.5%
22
80.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
Life Is A Magic
23
80.4%
27
94%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
kharj clasher
23
80.1%
26
92.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
Vv_DR☆GONS_vV
5
22%
30
100%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
w@® ¦ńf¦ń¦7€
24
89.5%
19
71.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
thaiนี้รักสงบ
28
95%
24
85.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
قهرمانان آتشین
28
97.3%
27
94.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
ابطال العدل
27
90.9%
28
97%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
Nosferatu
25
90.7%
9
34.4%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
UNBEATABLETURKS
11
90.4%
6
48%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
月夜世家
11
84%
12
84.4%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
جنگجویان کلش
14
94.8%
11
75.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
圣域
10
83.8%
5
41.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
万天神阁
14
97.2%
14
93.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
uciha 95
15
100%
0
0%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
SARIKIRAL
15
100%
13
97.6%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
Gezellig
15
100%
15
100%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Tie
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
vaniyar boys
15
100%
9
73.2%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
dont be poor!!
11
78.6%
10
73%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
truckers
22
85.4%
19
76.1%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
كلشي انتها
28
91.9%
28
95.6%
Team size
10 vs 10
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
DECEPTICONS
12
92%
14
90.8%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Loss
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No
KOLYANPUR BOYES
eli-te
13
96.4%
9
60%
Team size
5 vs 5
Status
Win
Ended
7 years ago
Hard Mode?
No